Legal Opinion

Goodbar & Co. v. Knight

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From the circuit court of, second district, Yalobusha county. ITon. Samuel 0. Cook, Judge. Goodbar & Company, a corporation, appellant, was plaintiff in the court below; Knight, one of the appellees, was defendant there; and Trusty, another appellee, was claimant. From a judgment in favor of Trusty, the claimant, the plaintiff appealed to the supreme court.

Read the full summary

From the circuit court of, second district, Yalobusha county. ITon. Samuel 0. Cook, Judge. Goodbar & Company, a corporation, appellant, was plaintiff in the court below; Knight, one of the appellees, was defendant there; and Trusty, another appellee, was claimant. From a judgment in favor of Trusty, the claimant, the plaintiff appealed to the supreme court. April 12, 1906, Knight, a merchant, while indebted to appellant, Goodbar & Company, made an assignment of his stock of goods and merchandise, of less value than $1,000, to appellee Trusty as assignee, for the benefit of creditors. The…

1Opinion of the CourtCalhoon, J.

We are not disposed to overrule Frank v. Robinson, 65 Miss., 162 (s.c., 3 South. Rep., 253), and the case before us must be

Affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Frank, Herman & Co. v. RobinsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Weiss, Dreyfous & Seiferth, Inc. v. Natchez Inv. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API