People v. Gorzen
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam:.
This appeal arises out of defendant’s conviction and sentence for one count of breaking and entering an occupied dwelling, MCL 750.110; MSA 28.305, and a probation revocation hearing stemming from an additional breaking and entering of an occupied dwelling, MCL 750.110; MSA 28.305, at a different time and place than the other.
Initially, defendant contends he must be resentenced because his counsel at sentencing had previously been an assistant prosecuting attorney who *466appeared against defendant in the cases involved in the instant appeal. We disagree.
Our review of the record…
2Cited by1 opinion
- People v. AlameMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983