Legal Opinion

People v. Gorzen

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1983No. Docket No. 64611PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:.

This appeal arises out of defendant’s conviction and sentence for one count of breaking and entering an occupied dwelling, MCL 750.110; MSA 28.305, and a probation revocation hearing stemming from an additional breaking and entering of an occupied dwelling, MCL 750.110; MSA 28.305, at a different time and place than the other.

Initially, defendant contends he must be resentenced because his counsel at sentencing had previously been an assistant prosecuting attorney who *466appeared against defendant in the cases involved in the instant appeal. We disagree.

Our review of the record…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. AlameMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API