Crane v. Cox
New Mexico Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of Dona Ana County; Edward L. Medler, District Judge; • Defendant was proceeding in exact conformity with the act of 1913. Laws 1913, ch. 84, sec. 34-40. Laws of 1913 is a valid exercise of legislative power. Sec. 1, ch. 84, laws 1913, repeled ch. 22, laws of 1899. Judgment of the lower Court could not have been founded on sec. 34, ch. 84, laws 1913. No formal assignment of errors appears to have been filed or set forth in appellant’s brief.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of Dona Ana County; Edward L. Medler, District Judge; • Defendant was proceeding in exact conformity with the act of 1913. Laws 1913, ch. 84, sec. 34-40. Laws of 1913 is a valid exercise of legislative power. Sec. 1, ch. 84, laws 1913, repeled ch. 22, laws of 1899. Judgment of the lower Court could not have been founded on sec. 34, ch. 84, laws 1913. No formal assignment of errors appears to have been filed or set forth in appellant’s brief. Laws 1907, -ch. 57, sec. 21. Is the language of sec. 34, ch. 84, laws 1913, retroactive? Laws 1912, ch. 84, sec. 34; Id.…
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT.
MECHEM, D. J. —
1 Chapter 84, laws of 1913, went into-effect immediately upon its approval, March 18, 1913,. and as it expressly repealed chapter laws of 1899, it provides the only procedure for the sale of property for delinquent taxes.
Section 34 of the act reads as follows:
“Within forty-five days after the first day of June in. each year the collector shall prepare, and cause to be published for not less than once in each week, for four consecutive weeks, in some newspaper published in his County,, or if there be no newspaper published in the County, then in some…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sohn v. WatersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Sturges v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. State ex rel. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Smith v. HumphreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Gladney v. SydnorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pace v. WightNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
- GEA Integrated Cooling Technology v. State Taxation & Revenue Dep'tNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Glasgow v. PeytonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
- Kreigh v. State Bank of AlamogordoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933