Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Sadek v. Nashville Recycling Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 9, 1988Published

1ConcurrenceKoch, Judge

I concur with the majority’s opinion only insofar as it pertains to the existence of probable cause.

In order to succeed in a malicious prosecution action, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant lacked probable cause when it initiated the criminal prosecution against the plaintiff. Kinnard v. Frierson, 190 Tenn. 304, 306, 229 S.W.2d 348, 349 (1950). Based upon my independent evaluation of the proof, I have determined that reasonable minds could only conclude that the defendants had a good faith belief that the plaintiff had stolen their used cooking fat when they initiated the criminal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kinnard v. FriersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API