Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh Valve Foundry & Construction Co. v. Gallagher

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 8, 1929No. 5145PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.

The appellant, defendant below and hereinafter referred to as defendant, was engaged in the installation of certain equipment at the plant of the Florida Light & Power Company at Dania, Fla. Prior to the time in question the defendant had been similarly engaged at Sanford, Fla. In order to assure proper performance of these contracts, a certain part of the labor organization was brought from Pittsburgh, where defendant’s home office was located; the defendant agreeing to defray transportation expenses from Pittsburgh to Florida and to make allowance to the employee…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railroad v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Fletcher v. Baltimore & Potomac RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Gall v. Detroit Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Railway Co. v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Martin v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Western Express Co. v. SmeltzerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
  2. Howard W. Luff Co. v. CapeceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  3. Ryan-Richards, Inc. v. WhitesidesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  4. Thouron v. AcreeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API