Legal Opinion

United States v. Champlin Refining Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 7, 1951No. 433Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

341 U.S. 290 (1951)

UNITED STATES ET AL.

v.

CHAMPLIN REFINING CO.

No. 433.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued March 8-9, 1951.

Decided May 7, 1951.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA.

Charles H. Weston argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Morison, John F. Davis, Daniel W. Knowlton and H. L. Underwood.

Dan Moody argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief were Harry O. Glasser, Nathan Scarritt, E.S. Champlin and Samuel H. Horne.

2Opinion of the Court · ClarkJustice Clark

Section 1 of the Interstate Commerce Act…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. McFarland v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. The Pipe Line CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. United States v. South Buffalo Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API