Bond v. Corbett
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Tliis case comes to this Court by "Writ of Error to the District Court of Eamsey County. The case was tried by jury and the errors complained of arise upon exceptions taken to the admission and rejection of certain evidence, and to the charge of the Court to the jury, which appear at length on the Bill of Exceptions contained in the record certified to this Court. A motion for a new trial was denied by the Court below, and judgment entered upon the verdict.
Read the full summary
Tliis case comes to this Court by "Writ of Error to the District Court of Eamsey County. The case was tried by jury and the errors complained of arise upon exceptions taken to the admission and rejection of certain evidence, and to the charge of the Court to the jury, which appear at length on the Bill of Exceptions contained in the record certified to this Court. A motion for a new trial was denied by the Court below, and judgment entered upon the verdict. The points made by the parties, and the opinion of the Court, contain sufficient reference to the several alleged errors reviewed here.…
1Opinion of the Court
By the CouH
Elandrau, J.
The complaint contains a count for work and labor alleged to have been done and per*252formed by tbe Plaintiff for tbe Defendant, to tbe valne of Forty Dollars. Tbis count is on a quantum meruit. Tbe answer admits tbe labor, denies tbe .time of commencement, and avers that it was performed under a special contract by wbicb tbe Defendant was to pay for it in furnishing tbe Plaintiff a room in bis bouse and boarding ber and ber two children, and alleges performance. Tbe reply admits tbe special agreement, but avers that the Defendant did not furnish tbe room until after tbe…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Raymond v. BearnardNew York Supreme Court · 1815
- Jennings v. CampNew York Supreme Court · 1816
- Tuttle v. MayoNew York Supreme Court · 1810
- Champlin v. ButlerNew York Supreme Court · 1820
- Little v. DAWSONSupreme Court of the United States · 1791
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- First National Bank v. FordWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
- Noonan v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Northwestern Cement & Concrete Pavement Co. v. Norwegian-Danish Evangelical Lutheran Augsburg SeminarySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- State ex rel. Merrick v. District Court of Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Caldwell v. BruggermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.