Legal Opinion

In re the Discipline of an Attorney

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 26, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

Bar counsel and the respondent cross-appeal from a judgment of a single justice of this court admonishing the respondent. We affirm.

Background. Bar counsel filed with the Board of Bar Overseers (board) a petition for discipline alleging that the respondent had engaged in a conflict of interest by recording a mortgage discharge at the request of the mortgagor without first contacting the mortgagee, the mortgagor’s father, for whom the respondent had drafted but not recorded the discharge several years earlier. A hearing committee found that the respondent had violated Mass. R. Prof. C. 1.9…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In the Matter of AlterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. In re FinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  3. In the Matter of PikeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. In re HoickaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  5. In re RingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API