In re the Discipline of an Attorney
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
Bar counsel and the respondent cross-appeal from a judgment of a single justice of this court admonishing the respondent. We affirm.
Background. Bar counsel filed with the Board of Bar Overseers (board) a petition for discipline alleging that the respondent had engaged in a conflict of interest by recording a mortgage discharge at the request of the mortgagor without first contacting the mortgagee, the mortgagor’s father, for whom the respondent had drafted but not recorded the discharge several years earlier. A hearing committee found that the respondent had violated Mass. R. Prof. C. 1.9…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In the Matter of AlterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- In re FinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- In the Matter of PikeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- In re HoickaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- In re RingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.