Legal Opinion

Darby v. Interstate Life & Accident Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 26, 1963No. 39961PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhakdt, Judge.

Where an insurance company seeks to invoke an exclusion contained in its policy, it has the burden of showing that the facts came within the exclusion. Gaynor v. Travelers Ins. Co., 12 Ga. App. 601 (5) (77 SE 1072). Thus, in the case sub judice, when the insurance company, in defense to plaintiff’s action, contended that the insured was intentionally shot by one Davis, the burden was on it to show that such was the case. In Davis’ affidavit he asserted that he “meant to shoot him [the insured] because he said he had a gun and reached into his pocket.” The facts established by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCarty v. National Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Gaynok v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Raven v. Dodd's Auto Sales & Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Asbury v. Indiana Union Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. PLANTERS RURAL TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. v. ChanceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  5. Capital Automobile Co. v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API