Legal Opinion · Dissent

Reese v. Hartnett

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 13, 1950Published

1DissentRichards, C. J.

(dissenting) :

I cannot agree with the decision of the majority of the Court in this case.

The facts as stated in the majority opinion are substantially correct and it is unnecessary for me to restate them.

A review of the history of the law in this State with respect to Registration Officers, may be helpful in determining what was the intention of the Legislature at the time it enacted Chapter 185, of Volume 46 of the Laws of Delaware, the construction of which is involved in this litigation.

For some time prior to 1939 the Registration Officers of the State, with the exception of the City of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Collison v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
  2. Randolph v. Builders & Painters Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  3. State Ex Rel. James v. SchorrSupreme Court of Delaware · 1948
  4. State v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  5. State v. EmersonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API