Spearman Distributing Co. v. Boyette
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
This is an appeal by the defendant below from an order granting a new trial in a negligence action.
The jury rendered a verdict for the appel-lee in the amount of $1,800, and he filed his motion for a new trial asserting that said verdict was so grossly inadequate as to shock the judicial conscience of the court and further that said verdict was not sufficient to cover plaintiff’s pecuniary losses. The court granted the motion upon a finding that the verdict of the jury “ * * * is so inadequate that it shocks the judicial conscience of the Court and further finds that the Jury did not follow…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cloud v. FallisSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
- Russo v. ClarkSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
- Danek v. HoffmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
3Cited by5 opinions
- North Dade Imported Motors, Inc. v. Brundage Motors, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- National Western Life Insurance Co. v. WaltersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Leggett v. Seaboard Coast Line RailroadDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Glisson v. North Florida Telephone Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Lyman v. FantaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974