King v. Nelson

HOBSON, Judge.

This appeal arises out of a dispute as to attorney fees payable to plaintiff King’s attorneys under a contingent fee contract. The lower court entered its order determining that the contingent fee contract was a valid and binding contract and that the attorneys were entitled to 40% of any set*728tlement or recovery. The ultimate recovery was the amount of $9,000, 40% of which the lower court awarded as attorney fees. This order is the order on appeal. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The lower court correctly found that the contingent fee contract was valid and binding. In…