Legal Opinion

St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Burford

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 2, 1929PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMenaffy, J.

This suit was brought by appellees against the appellant to recover the sum of $699.49, claimed as damages to a shipment of cotton from Idabel, Oklahoma, to Houston, Texas. The facts, so far as necessary to state them, are as follows:

The appellees were the owners of 208 bales of cotton purchased by them at Idabel, Oklahoma, in the fall of 1925. The cotton was purchased for the appellees at Idabel by L. L. Ruggles, and was bought the latter part or about the second week of October. Appellee Burford went to Idabel on Saturday night, and saw this cotton on Sunday morning, and classed it for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Van PeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. ColeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. H. Rouw Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Robinson & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. BishopSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  2. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co., Thompson v. Shell, Admx.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  3. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. FineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GregorySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  5. Missouri Pac. R.R. Co., Thompson v. YandellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API