Legal Opinion

Benada v. Barnhill

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 25, 1969No. 2900Published

1Opinion of the Court

TATE, Judge.

The plaintiff mother sues for personal injuries sustained by her six-year-old boy. She appeals from judgment dismissing her suit.

The boy’s injuries were received in a pedestrian-crossing accident. The boy, David, collided with an automobile driven by Barnhill, who is made defendant along with his liability insurer.

The principal issue before the trial jury was whether Barnhill was negligent, it being conceded that David was too young to be contributorily negligent. The issue on appeal is whether the trial jury erred in finding Barnhill free of negligence.

The parties do not dispute…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Guillory v. HoreckySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  2. Davis v. BankstonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Herrin v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. McClelland v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API