Legal Opinion

Huertas v. Pino

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Alan L. Lebowitz, J.

In this personal injury action defendant Allstate Insurance Company seeks a declaration that it has no duty to defend or *777indemnify its insured, defendant Roche, for an accident which occurred on October 24, 1983 resulting in injuries to the plaintiff. A trial was held before this court without a jury on the framed issue: Whether the car involved in the accident, a 1976 Plymouth, was actually insured under Roche’s policy as of the date of the accident.

Plaintiff testified that on the evening in question, an automobile driven by defendant Harry Pino struck…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eveready Insurance v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Lloyd v. Government Employees' InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. In re the Arbitration between General Accident Insurance & Jean-BaptisteNew York Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API