State Ex Rel. Thompson v. Jackson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The court is equally divided. Chief Justice Day, Justice Abrahamson and Justice Bablitch believe that the amendments to the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program (MPCP) are contrary to art. I, § 18 and art. X, § 3 of the Wisconsin Constitution.
Justice Steinmetz, Justice Wilcox and Justice Geske believe, based both upon the legislation before us and the stipulated facts, that respondents have not met the burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the legislative amendments to MPCP violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Const., art. I, § 18 of the Wis. Const., art.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. GroverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. ElamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jackson v. BensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Home Valu, Inc. v. Pep Boys Manny, Moe and Jack of Delaware, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Ives v. CoopertoolsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Jackson v. BensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Home Valu Inc v. Pep Boys - Manny MoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.