Word v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
VEASEY, Chief Justice.
In this appeal, we review the scope of the statutory element of first degree rob bery that requires a finding that the defendant “displays what appears to be a deadly weapon.” 1 We clarify and reaffirm that to support a conviction for first degree robbery, the victim not only must have the subjective belief that the defendant possesses a deadly weapon but also this belief must be “accompanied by an objective physical manifestation that the robber appears to be displaying a deadly weapon.” 2
Although the victim in this case believed the defendant possessed a deadly weapon,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
- Chao v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- Downs v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- Deshields v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Walton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
- Bethard v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
- Kirk v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- FEDORKOWICZ v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
- Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.