Legal Opinion

Valley Industries, Inc. v. Martin

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 5, 1987No. 05-87-00500-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HECHT, Justice.

We granted the motion of Valley Industries, Inc. for leave to file a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the Honorable Harlan Martin, Judge of the 192nd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas, to vacate an order revoking leave for Valley to file a third-party petition, and we expedited oral argument. TEX.R.CIV.APP.P. 121(c), (e) & (f). We conclude that Judge Martin did not abuse his discretion, and that Valley had a legal remedy fully adequate to protect its rights. Thus, we deny Valley’s petition.

James Cook and others sued Valley and others for the wrongful…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Ryland Group, Inc. v. White, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
  3. Richard Plekowski v. Ralston-Purina Company, in Re Richard J. PlekowskiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. Threeway Constructors, Inc. v. Aten, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1983
  5. Paper Supply Co. v. Van MeterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Arthur Andersen LLP, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  2. State Ex Rel. Leung v. SandersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Joe Tibbs, Individually, and Joe Tibbs Auto Sales v. First Federal Savings Bank, Bryan, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2002
  4. State Ex Rel. Leung v. SandersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. in Re: Arthur Andersen LLP, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API