Rose v. Stoddard
Appellate Court of Illinois
Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Arthur W. Deselm, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Clark
delivered the opinion of the court.
In this case judgment was entered in favor of the defendant in error, as plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, as defendant, as guarantor on a lease, the amount of recovery being $10, alleged to have been paid on account of water taxes, and $76.49 for repairs made to an elevator in the property covered by the lease. The judgment was based on a finding, the case having been tried without the intervention of a jury.
The date of the lease was May 9, 1910, and the term fixed by it ended April 30,1911. The suit was brought March 6,…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Atherton v. ShellyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920