Legal Opinion

Wright v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 2, 1983No. 65162PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shulman, Chief Judge.

Appellant was indicted for and convicted of forgery. Code Ann. § 26-1701 (OCGA § 16-9-1). He now appeals from that conviction, alleging several enumerations of error.

1. Appellant first protests the state’s use of the theory of parties to a crime (Code Ann. § 26-801 (OCGA § 16-2-20)) to convict appellant of forgery when the indictment did not charge him with being a party to the crime.

A person need not be indicted under § 26-801 before the state may prove his culpability for a crime as a party to that crime. Hughes v. State, 150 Ga. App. 90 (256 SE2d 634). While it may be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bacon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  2. Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Burke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. High v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  5. Rakestraw v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Tidwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. McGowan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. Chadwick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Trumpler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API