Wright v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Shulman, Chief Judge.
Appellant was indicted for and convicted of forgery. Code Ann. § 26-1701 (OCGA § 16-9-1). He now appeals from that conviction, alleging several enumerations of error.
1. Appellant first protests the state’s use of the theory of parties to a crime (Code Ann. § 26-801 (OCGA § 16-2-20)) to convict appellant of forgery when the indictment did not charge him with being a party to the crime.
A person need not be indicted under § 26-801 before the state may prove his culpability for a crime as a party to that crime. Hughes v. State, 150 Ga. App. 90 (256 SE2d 634). While it may be…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bacon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Burke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- High v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Rakestraw v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lawrence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Tidwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- McGowan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Chadwick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Trumpler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.