Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Haskins

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 9, 1953No. 17096PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Stone

Defendant Lambert, by written listing card, employed plaintiff Haskins as sole and exclusive agent to sell or exchange his farm at an agreed price and on an agreed commission, “This agreement to run 2 months from date and thereafter until 30 days written notice is given of withdrawal from market.” Plaintiff contacted some prospective purchasers, but had failed to produce one ready, willing and able to purchase when, approximately a month after date of the listing, defendant himself made sale of the premises at a lower price independent of an agent. Subsequently, plaintiff brought the action…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dole v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. Ingold v. SymondsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Golden Gate Packing Co. v. Farmers' UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Snook v. PageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  5. Roberts v. HarringtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Turman v. BuckallewSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. Aronoff v. Western Federal Savings & Loan Assn.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Timm v. ReitzColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Garrett v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  5. Concialdi v. PUEBLO GAS AND FUEL COMPANYSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API