In re Fowler
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON OBJECTIONS TO CONFIRMATION OF CHAPTER 13 PLAN
THOMAS C. HOLMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
The court is asked to determine whether Cal. Rev. & Tax Code (“RTC”) § 4103(b) is unconstitutional as pre-empted by the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution. Debtor contends that RTC § 4103(b) is not “applicable nonbankruptcy law” within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 511(a), that RTC § 4103(b) is therefore pre-empted by the Bankruptcy Code and that the interest rate to be paid on a secured real property tax claim in a chapter 13 plan is determined under Till et ux. v. SCS Credit…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Owen v. OwenSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. MortierSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State of Tenn. v. Michael CorrinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- In re City of DetroitUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
- In re City of DetroitUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
- In re City of DetroitUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
- In re BrattUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2015