Legal Opinion

Hamada v. Valley National Bank

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 23, 1976No. 1 CA-CIV 3145PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment awarding appellee $50,000.

The facts show that two individuals, Mr. Peterson and Mr. Steven Carr, formed a Utah corporation called Planformation, Inc. On October 5, 1970, Norman E. Smith, a commercial loan officer at the Valley National Bank approved a $5,000 loan to Planformation secured by some corporate accounts receivable. Mr. and Mrs. Peterson pledged to the bank 253,000 shares of stock in a corporation called Pilot Titanium. He also furnished the bank with a financial statement which showed the value of the pledged…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Henry S. Cram v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd., Robert S. Wahab, Jr. v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  2. McCarty C. Mercury Metalcraft Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Cosper v. the Valley BankArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Kaufman v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  5. Perkins v. First Nat. Bk. of HolbrookArizona Supreme Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hill-Shafer Partnership v. Chilson Family TrustArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. National Industries, Inc., a Kentucky Corporation v. Republic National Life Insurance Company, a Texas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Consolidated Roofing & Supply Co. v. GrimmCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. First Community Bank v. Maureen GaughanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Leo Eisenberg & Co., Inc. v. PaysonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API