Legal Opinion

Brooker v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 4, 2012No. 12-605 CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND OPINION

HEWITT, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs Carey W. Brooker, Lenora Renee Brooker, Russell Jay Gould, David Wynn Miller, Monte Edwin Mueller and Edward William Bange, appearing pro se, filed the above-captioned case on September 14, 2012. For the reasons stated, the court finds that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction and dismisses the ease sua sponte. The court also finds plaintiffs’ complaint to be deserving of sanction pursuant to the court’s inherent power to sanction bad-faith conduct.

I. Background

Plaintiffs’ filing with the court is separated into two parts. The first part (Part…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  2. Mazie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
  3. SMITH v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
  4. The Modern Sportsman, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
  5. University of South Florida Board of Trustees v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API