Legal Opinion

Spero v. West-Side Bank

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1889PublishedCited by 6 opinions

' Appeal from special term, New York city and county. Action by David Spero against the West-Side Bank of New York city, for the conversion of checks. The court made an order denying plaintiff’s motion to vacate an order requiring plaintiff to submit to an examination, as a witness in the action, before trial. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDaniels, J.

The action has been brought for tile conversion of checks alleged to have been the property of the firm of which the plaintiff and Bachel Friedman were members. She has assigned her interest in the demands in suit to the plaintiff, and it was prosecuted by him to recover the value of the checks. There was a large number of these checks received in the course of the business of the firm, and negotiated by a person in its employment as a book-keeper and clerk, whose indorsements were alleged to have been made without authority. By the defense which has been presented it is proposed to show that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jenkins v. . PutnamNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dudley v. New York Filter Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. De Lacy v. WalcottThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1891
  3. Haynes v. CreightonNew York Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Dudley v. New York Filter Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. Fluchtwanger v. DessarNew York Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API