Legal Opinion
In Re APPLICATION OF ENBRIDGE ENERGY TO REPLACE AND RELOCATE LINE 5
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 2026No. 168335, 168336, 168337, 168338, 168339, and 168346Published
1Opinion of the Court
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Megan K. Cavanagh Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth M. Welch Kyra H. Bolden Kimberly A. Thomas Noah P. Hood This syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been Reporter of Decisions: prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. Kimberly K. Muschong In re APPLICATION OF ENBRIDGE ENERGY TO REPLACE AND RELOCATE LINE 5 Docket Nos. 168335, 168336, 168337, 168338, 168339, and 168346. Argued March 16, 2026 (Calendar Nos. 2 and 3). Decided July 31, 2026. These…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Department of Transportation v. Public CitizenSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Skinner v. Square D Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Rogers C. B. Morton, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the Department of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.