Legal Opinion

City of Elgin v. Rippberger

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 17, 1978No. 76-539PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nash

Plaintiff, City of Elgin, brought this action for injunction against defendant, Carl Rippberger, to require compliance by defendant with the zoning ordinance of the City of Elgin and for the imposition of a fine for its violation. The complaint alleged defendant maintained a multiple-family dwelling in a zoning district in which multiple uses were not permitted. Defendant’s second amended answer raised as his single affirmative defense the existence of a lawful nonconforming multiple-family use of the premises. After a bench trial the court entered judgment in favor of defendant.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Griffin v. DardaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  2. Camp v. City of EvanstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  3. People ex rel. Gutknecht v. EmersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. AustinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. Bond Kildeer Marketplace v. CBS OutdoorAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  3. City of Peoria v. DanzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API