Legal Opinion · Dissent

Axelberg v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 21, 2014No. A12-1341Published

1DissentPage, Justice

Today the court, in essence, concludes that losing the privilege to drive is a small price to pay for saving your life. In reaching this conclusion, the court fails to adhere to our rules of statutory construction, our case law, and our constitutional mandate to do justice. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

I

First, it is important to have a full understanding of the implications of the court’s decision. The court’s decision not *221only discourages victims of domestic abuse who happen to be intoxicated from fleeing their abusers when the only means to do so is in a motor vehicle and allows them…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. State, Department of Public Safety v. JuncewskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. O'Leary v. WangensteenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API