Legal Opinion
Crews v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 13, 1997No. 97-361 CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HORN, Judge.
In this motion, plaintiff, acting pro se, asks leave of court to proceed in forma pauperis to pursue a claim for “immediate declaratory judgment” against the United States, apparently in connection with his eviction from an apartment in West Germany, following termination of his employment with the United States Army. For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs complaint is dismissed, and his motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied.
*12Although plaintiff does not present a concise statement of facts, allegedly he is a disabled veteran. It appears that he was employed by the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- In Re Prison Litigation Reform ActCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thomas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Jennette v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Jennette v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Crews v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Nzongda v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007