Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cannut

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 2, 1919Published

Appeals from Whitley Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*113Opinion op the Court by

Judge Quin

Dismissing appeals, and denying motions for appeals.

Five persons made application for a. reward for the apprehension of two boys who were indicted for mule stealing.

Section 4283 of the statutes provides:

“It shall be the duty of the person so securing the arrest and conviction, or delivery of any person guilty of any horse or mule stealing, if he desires said reward, to apply to the court in which the accused is convicted or bond forfeited for same, and if the court is satisfied from testimony taken that the person applying for such reward has in good faith,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. American National Bank v. Minor & SonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. American Car & Foundry Co. v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  3. Commonwealth v. TudorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  4. Ex parte HerrickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879
  5. Spalding v. Wathen, Mueller & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API