City of Naperville v. Watson
Illinois Supreme Court
1DissentJustice Freeman
Defendant contends the trial court erroneously barred him from asserting the affirmative defense of necessity. I disagree with the majority’s refusal to address this contention. Further, I agree with defendant that he had the right to present the necessity defense to the jury. Accordingly, I dissent.
Initially, I agree with the majority that Illinois Vehicle Code section 11 — 501(a) (625 ILCS 5/11 — 501(a) (West 1994)) does not excuse an intoxicated person from "sleeping it off” in a parked vehicle. The majority correctly interprets section 11 — 501(a), based on the provision’s plain language,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hux v. RabenIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. HudsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. BratcherIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. UngerIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- The People v. KalpakIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.