Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Naperville v. Watson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1997No. 80315Published

1DissentJustice Freeman

Defendant contends the trial court erroneously barred him from asserting the affirmative defense of necessity. I disagree with the majority’s refusal to address this contention. Further, I agree with defendant that he had the right to present the necessity defense to the jury. Accordingly, I dissent.

Initially, I agree with the majority that Illinois Vehicle Code section 11 — 501(a) (625 ILCS 5/11 — 501(a) (West 1994)) does not excuse an intoxicated person from "sleeping it off” in a parked vehicle. The majority correctly interprets section 11 — 501(a), based on the provision’s plain language,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hux v. RabenIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. HudsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. BratcherIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. UngerIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  5. The People v. KalpakIllinois Supreme Court · 1957

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API