Legal Opinion

Knudson v. Curley

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 6, 1883PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Fillmore county, where the action was tried by Farmer, J., without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The complaint' in this action was clearly drawn as a bill in equity, under the former system of pleading, to set aside a tax sale and the certificate issued thereon as being a cloud upon plaintiff’s title. The order in which the trial was proceeded with in *434the introduction of evidence, corroborates this view, the plaintiff assuming the burden of proving the cloud and its invalidity.

The complaint was not good as one to remove a specific cloud from the title, because it alleges no facts showing that the tax sale or certificate was not valid; the only allegation in that regard being “that said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Walton v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kipp v. DawsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Farnham v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  3. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  4. Oakland Cemetery Ass'n v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. Feller v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API