Legal Opinion

Holt v. Morgan

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1977No. 13165PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOLIN, Judge.

Plaintiffs and defendants owned adjoining lots in a recorded subdivision. Plaintiffs, alleging the boundary between the two lots had not been amicably or judicially established, brought a boundary action against defendants. Following trial judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiffs establishing the boundary in conformity with a plat prepared by a surveyor who testified for plaintiffs. Defendants appeal, contending the boundary should be fixed as recommended by the court-appointed surveyor. We affirm.

Plaintiffs alleged they owned Lot 104 and the west half of Lot 103 of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dufrene v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  2. Harvey v. HavardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  3. Harvey v. HavardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Jewell v. PorcheSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1847
  5. Bollin v. StaffordLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barham v. Department of HighwaysLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Sellers v. BarthelemyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API