Legal Opinion · Dissent

Moore v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 26, 1992No. 91-CA-807-MRPublished

1DissentJohnson, Judge

I respectfully dissent. It is generally true that the Cabinet’s supervision of parolees falls within the zone of quasi-legislative or quasi-judicial activities referred to in prior cases. See Cabinet for Human Resources v. Poore, Ky.App., 711 S.W.2d 498 (1986); cf. Bolden v. City of Covington, Ky., 803 S.W.2d 577 (1991); Com., Dept. of Banking & Securities v. Brown, Ky., 605 S.W.2d 497 (1980); Grogan v. Commonwealth, Ky., 577 S.W.2d 4 (1979). Thus, in the ordinary case, the Cabinet will not be liable in damages simply because á parolee commits a tort. This is true even in these cases where…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Grayson Fraternal Order of Eagles, Aerie No. 3738, Inc. v. ClaywellKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Gas Service Co., Inc. v. City of LondonKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Garcia v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Ramona Freeman, Etc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  5. Calvert Investments, Inc. v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer DistrictKentucky Supreme Court · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API