Barron's Use v. United Railway Co.

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

These appeals involve condemnation of land for railway purposes. Former trials were reviewed in 93 Pa. Superior Ct. 555. The two cases in which new trials were then awarded have been retried, and defendant has again appealed. The same witnesses that testified before, testified again, and we find it unnecessary to repeat what was said before concerning their competency; the assignments questioning it are overruled. So, too, with the complaint that use-plaintiff is not entitled to sue; though she named no legal plaintiff she proved that while she was not the owner at the time…