Stinson v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Blackburn, Chief Judge.
Willie L. Stinson was convicted by a jury for trafficking in cocaine. Following the denial of his motion for new trial, he appeals his conviction, arguing that the trial court erred in: (1) not suppressing evidence of an illegal search and seizure; (2) not declaring a mistrial when impermissible character evidence was introduced into testimony; and (3) admitting a prior conviction into evidence. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
1. Stinson contends that the trial court erred in not suppressing evidence of an illegal search and seizure. We disagree.
In reviewing…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Sultenfuss v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Buckholts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Blance v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003