Legal Opinion

Wolff v. United States

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California

Decided March 22, 1909No. 13,836Published

On Application for Review of a Decision by the Board of United States General Appraisers.

1Opinion of the Court

VAN EEEET, District Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of General Appraisers sustaining the action of the collector of customs at the port of San Francisco in assessing and collecting the duty on a certain consignment of German kiimmel, known as “Gilka Kiimmel,” imported by the petitioner. The question involved before the collector was whether the commodity was dutiable under Tariff Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule H, 30 Stat. 173 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1653), which fixes the tax of $2.25 per proof gallon, or came within the trade convention with Germany then in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hermann v. Port Blakely Mill Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1896
  2. United States v. China & Japan Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
  3. United States v. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
  4. United States v. O. G. Hempstead & SonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1907
  5. Mendelson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API