Legal Opinion

Rogowski v. Royce W. Day Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1986PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Con. G. Cholakis, J.

At issue in these motions is the availability of information concerning experts who will be called to testify at the time of trial. The third-party defendant has served notices, pursuant to the 1985 amendment of CPLR 3101 (d), upon the plaintiff and the third-party plaintiffs demanding information concerning their expert witnesses. That section provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "Upon request, each party shall identify each person whom the party expects to call as an expert witness at trial and shall disclose in reasonable detail the subject…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. McGoldrick v. Whitney M. Young, Jr. Health Center, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1987
  2. McKinstry v. Werner Machine Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Noble v. AmbrosioNew York Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Reese v. Harper Surface Finishing SystemsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Cagatay v. Caledonian HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API