Legal Opinion

Spellman v. Spellman

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 14, 1992No. 91-279PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.

The plaintiff, Michael Spellman, appeals the decision of the Superior Court (Barry, J.), approving the recommendation of the Master (Peter J. Bourque, Esq.), on the defendant’s, Joyce Spell-man, motion to enforce the property settlement provision of the parties’ divorce decree. Arguing that the trial court’s order was an impermissible modification of a property settlement, the plaintiff raises three issues on appeal. First, he asserts that the trial court erred in determining that the equity in the marital home was to be divided at the time of its sale, rather than at the time of the divorce.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Douglas v. DouglasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1968
  2. Crooker v. CrookerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. Zeigler v. ZeiglerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Smith v. TrugliaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. PikeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API