Legal Opinion
Orangefield Independent School District v. Callahan & Associates
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided January 29, 2003No. 09-00-171 CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DON BURGESS, Justice.
Orangefield Independent School District (“OISD”) appeals a final judgment in favor of Callahan & Associates (“Callahan”), its architect for a school addition. Originally, OISD filed suit against its general contrac tor, Cleveland Building Systems, Inc., Callahan, and other parties. 1 The original cause was stayed to allow contractually-required arbitration between Callahan and OISD. The arbitrator entered an award favorable to Callahan. OISD then filed an application to vacate or modify the award and Callahan applied for entry of judgment on the award. After the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Burlington Northern Railroad v. TUCO Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
- Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. PMAC, LTD.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- City of Baytown v. C.L. Winter, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
- Jamison & Harris v. National Loan Investors, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lawson v. Archer, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
- Anchor Paving Company, Inc. and Anchor, Inc. v. Wood Electrical Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
- in Re: Donald Lawson, Individually and D/B/A V.I.P. Home Inspections and Mark Guillerman, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008