Gregory Eugene Baines v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARTHA HILL JAMISON, Justice.
Appellant, Gregory Eugene Baines (“appellant”), appeals from his conviction for misdemeanor theft. In his sole issue on appeal, appellant complains that the trial court erred in overruling his objection to a portion of the State’s final argument. Appellant argues that the State improperly commented on his failure to call two witnesses at trial. We affirm.
Background
Appellant was charged with theft of property valued at more than $500 but less than $1,500. He pleaded not guilty and the case was tried to a jury. The jury found appellant guilty, and the trial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Zuliani v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Patrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Abel Luna v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2015
- Bruce Edward Lee v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2024
- Christian Fuentes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2016
- Contina Felicia Means v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2015
- Isbell, John B.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.