Legal Opinion

Williams v. Hamlin

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Decided July 1, 1854PublishedCited by 3 opinions

This was an action to foreclose a judgment lien; and to recover money.

1Opinion of the CourtGholson, J.

This case has been submitted for judgment on a default against all the defendants except J. W. Ashar, and judgment for the sale of certain real estate described in the petition, is asked.

Upon looking at the summons, I find that it is endorsed “ for the recovery of money only, amount claimed for which, with interest from the 5th May 1851, judgment will be taken if you fail to answer $267.85 and also costs $11.98.” The judgment which is asked, is not for the recovery of money only, but for the sale of real estate. I notice that in the precipe it is stated, that the suit is brought to foreclose…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Elmen v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Weaver v. GardnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  3. A. M. White & Co. v. FreeseOhio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1870

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API