Legal Opinion

Bensalem Township School District v. Rose Bowl, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1965No. Appeal, No. 150PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, P. J.,

This is an action of assumpsit by the plaintiff school district to recover amusement taxes for the year 1960-61. The resolution of the school board, adopted June 13,1960, under the provisions of the act approved June 25, 1947, P. L. 1145, and its amendments, 53 PS §6851 et seq., imposed a tax upon “the admission fee or privilege to attend or engage in any amusement” and was to be paid “by the person acquiring such privilege, said tax being at the rate of one cent (1^) for each ten cents (10^) of such established price.”

Defendant operates a thirty-two lane bowling alley…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Turco Paint & Varnish Co. v. KalodnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Tremont Township School District AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Plymouth Lanes, Inc. v. Plymouth TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Fierro v. WilliamsportSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Eck v. Williamsport School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gettysburg Borough v. Retreat, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County1983
  2. Pocono International Raceway v. Township of Tunkhannock, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API