Legal Opinion

Pirch v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1969No. 250PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SPIESS, Chief Judge.

This is a products liability case involving a truck rim manufactured and sold by the appellant, Firestone Tire & Rubber Company. The plaintiff (appellee) sought recovery as against Firestone on the ground that certain personal injuries sustained by him were proximately caused (1) by Firestone’s manufacture and sale of a product (truck rim) of an unreasonably dangerous design, or (2) the negligent failure of Firestone to adequately warn of dangers incident to the foreseeable method of using the product to those foreseeably using it.

Appeal is from the judgment upon…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Brasfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Grady B. Burroughs, Also Known as Sam Grady Biggs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  4. People v. KasemMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Orr v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. LaneyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. State v. AragonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  4. State v. TurnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Godfrey v. HemenwayAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API