Legal Opinion

Howard v. Manderfield

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 29, 1883PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeals by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Brown county, entered upon the report of a referee, and from an order by Severance, J., (acting for the judge of the 9th district,) refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

Action in the nature of trover for the conversion of a stock of merchandise, in a store at Sleepy Bye, Brown county. One Whiting had been tbe owner of the property. On the sixth day of October, Whiting sold the property to this plaintiff with the intent to defraud creditors, in which fraudulent purpose the plaintiff participated. Among the creditors of Whiting was one Woodworth, and a firm doing business under the name of Barrington & Schmahl. On tbe eighth of October, a writ of attachment was issued out of the district court against the property of Whiting, in favor of Barrington &, Schmahl,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Thornburgh v. HandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Curtis v. WardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850
  3. Ball v. . LineyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Higgins v. WhitneyNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  5. Mathews v. DensmoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fisher v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Storz v. FinklesteinNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Black Hills Mercantile Co. v. GardinerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Beyersdorf v. SumpSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  5. Beckstead v. GriffithIdaho Supreme Court · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API