Carmichael v. City of Jackson
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Justice.
From the facts recited by the Court of Appeals it appears that the trial judge dismissed the motion for new trial upon the ground that necessary parties had not been served. The case as tried involved an attack upon the constitutionality of a State law. The dismissal of the motion for a new trial had the effect of dismissing or disposing of a case involving the constitutionality of a State law. In determining whether or not these circumstances give the Supreme Court jurisdiction of the writ of error excepting to the judgment dismissing the motion for a new trial, the policy…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Peavy v. PeavySupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Luke v. LukeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Cross v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
- Hopkins v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Womack v. WomackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
3Cited by2 opinions
- Perry v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Carmichael v. City of JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942