Legal Opinion

Carmichael v. City of Jackson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 10, 1942No. 14012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Justice.

From the facts recited by the Court of Appeals it appears that the trial judge dismissed the motion for new trial upon the ground that necessary parties had not been served. The case as tried involved an attack upon the constitutionality of a State law. The dismissal of the motion for a new trial had the effect of dismissing or disposing of a case involving the constitutionality of a State law. In determining whether or not these circumstances give the Supreme Court jurisdiction of the writ of error excepting to the judgment dismissing the motion for a new trial, the policy…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peavy v. PeavySupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  2. Luke v. LukeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. Cross v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  4. Hopkins v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  5. Womack v. WomackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Perry v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  2. Carmichael v. City of JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API