Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Jurgens

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1986No. 85-612PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gulbrandson

Jay C. Jurgens, the father, appeals from the amended findings of fact, conclusions of law and order entered September 30, 1985, in Flathead County District Court. He contends that the second judge, after hearing motions to amend and for a new trial, erred in amending the first judge’s original findings, conclusions and order. He asks this Court to reverse the amended findings, conclusions and order and remand with instructions to reinstate the original order. We reverse and remand for clarification.

The parties were married in Coeur D’Alene, Idaho, in 1972. They had one child, Thomas Jason…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Maurice A. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  2. In Re the Marriage of CarlsonMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Carnegie Nat. Bank v. City of Wolf PointCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  4. State v. CardenMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People v. . TrimbleNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of SaylorMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  2. In Re the Marriage of ReviousMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Isaacs v. IsaacsMontana Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API