Legal Opinion

People v. Duffy

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 1975PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether the defendant’s constitutional rights were violated by the prosecutor’s cross-examination concerning the particulars of his previous drug use and possession. The Court of Appeals considered that *858contention and found no violation of defendant’s constitutional rights. [See 36 NY2d 258.]

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. DuffyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. People v. KelseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. People v. YusufiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. People v. MonroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. People v. FrazierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API