Legal Opinion

Rodin Properties-Shore Mall N. V. v. Ullman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 26, 1999PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered on or about January 8, 1999, granting defendants Cushman & Wakefield of Pennsylvania, Inc. and Cushman & Wakefield, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the second, third, fourth and fifth causes of action in the amended complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs and disbursements, the motion denied, and said causes of action reinstated.

Plaintiff, a consortium of investors, loaned Shore Mall Associates, L.P. (SMA) $49,125,000 to refinance a New Jersey shopping center known as Shore Mall. The loan was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Prudential Insurance v. Dewey, Ballantine, Bushby, Palmer & WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Apple Records, Inc. v. Capitol Records, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Assured Guaranty (UK) Ltd. v. J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Allstate Insurance v. Countrywide Financial Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
  3. Mandarin Trading Ltd. v. WildensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Andersen v. WeinrothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Flandera v. AFA America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API