Legal Opinion
Carroll Street Properties v. Puente
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided June 14, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
George M. Heymann, J.
*897Petitioner commenced this holdover proceeding on the ground that the respondents violated a substantial obligation of their lease by using their apartment for commercial purposes, i.e., running a baby-sitting service.
Respondents have moved this court pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) for an order dismissing the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.
Petitioner has cross-moved for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212 (b).
Factual Background
Mr. Puente has resided in the subject premises, located at 1111 Carroll Street, apartment 2B, Brooklyn, New…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Park East Land Corp. v. FinkelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. RothNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Park West Village v. LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. Town of ClarkstownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Vittorio Properties, Inc. v. AlprinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marick Real Estate, LLC v. RamirezAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2005
- Riverdale Osborne Towers Housing Associates, LLC v. KeatonCivil Court of the City of New York · 2013